The listed reviews go from "Before x.x.x" to the latest version, except for the top one, that's the latest version. Now, it doesn't make sense to go from the current version to the latest and upwards to the second last, right? I mean, wouldn't it make sense to go from the current version to one version below that and so forth? The first review shouldn't be as important as a review for the second last version, because that version may have so much more. Correct?

If I look through reviews, I don't really care if someone talked about a missing feature, if someone else talks about what a great feature has been added in version x.x.x (which is a newer version, and the same feature someone says is lacking/missing).

A forum thread/topci does have the latest at the bottom, we could do that too. But it's just back and forth if you ask me. What do you guys think?